"This year's discussion began with a focus on the ACA's individual insurance market, but current healthcare proposals go further and do not enact meaningful, needed repairs to the ACA", the letter says.
An analysis by the Center for American Progress estimated that 30,100 North Dakota residents would lose coverage under the House bill, while 1,190 households with incomes of $1 million or more would receive tax cuts averaging $32,271.
Collins, a moderate Republican from ME, said she wanted to read an assessment by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office on its impact on cost and insurance coverage before making her decision. They don't tell you those they refer to are only bought Obamacare to dodge the IRS penalty for not having health coverage.
That's the takeaway as first reported by the Washington Post.
U.S. Senate Republicans plan to unveil the text of their draft healthcare bill on Thursday as senators struggle over issues such as the future of the Medicaid program for the poor and bringing down insurance costs. That law's 2010 passage involved 79 House hearings and a 25-day Senate floor debate. It also removes language restricting federally-subsidized health plans from covering abortions, which may have run afoul of complex budget rules. An average of eight polls compiled by the New York Times showed 47 percent of North Dakotans oppose the Republican bill, while 31 percent support it. Rep. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., voted for the bill.
In many respects, McConnell's revisions are not a surprise.
Oil is rising after USA inventories fall more than expected
Brent was trading 26 cents down at $45.76 per barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate dropped 20 cents to $43.31. And a research note from BMI highlighted some countries had increased supply prior to the latest Opec agreement.
So, to review: The Senate bill keeps Obamacare's subsidy structure in place while paring back eligibility, guts Medicaid more slowly but more severely than the House bill, and still lets states drop essential consumer protections, although not as many as the House. But the end result is the same. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the changes would lead to a reduction in spending on Medicaid of more than $800 billion over a decade.
The Senate bill would give states more leeway in opting out of the ACA's insurance regulations through expanding the use of so-called "1332" waivers already embedded within the law. In addition, a growing number of Republicans are frustrated with the process, saying they may have just a few days to study the draft before being forced to vote on a major piece of legislation.
Across Capitol Hill, House conservatives are also growing a bit nervous with the lack of clarity on what's about to come out of the Senate.
Medicaid expansion: Obamacare's Medicaid expansion, which extended the program to those making between 100% and 138% of the federal poverty limit, would be phased out over three or four years (there are conflicting reports) starting in 2020. That means the numbers of people receiving premium subsidies would gradually shrink as the maximum qualifying income was lowered. The prohibition on plans charging sick people more than healthy people?
Trump administration officials and Republican members of Congress have argued that the Medicaid changes will not cause anyone to lose insurance coverage directly. Almost a third viewed it as acceptable and 15 percent saw it as "tolerable". For example, the Maine Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers has said the needle bill would make people admit to committing a crime and that if a person lies about not having a needle and an officer is stuck during a search, it could be considered assault on an officer. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said on the Senate floor Tuesday. This includes preserving coverage for dependent children up to age 26 on parents' health plans, guaranteeing affordable coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, and assuring that health plans offer essential health benefit (EHB) packages.
The Countering Iran's Destabilizing Activities Act that also includes sanctions on Russian Federation was passed in the Senate with an overwhelming majority 98-2 and dashed Trump's desires of better relations with Moscow. Passing a bill through the Senate will require balancing the demands of moderates such as Sens.
Comments